Archive for the ‘Contemporary Antisemitism 1: Reports & Statistics’ Category

‘Kauft nicht bei Juden’ will worsen the conflict

Tuesday, November 30th, 2010
This piece, by the Rt Hon Dr Dennis Macshane MP, was first published in the Jerusalem Post on 29/11/2010

Kauft nicht bei Juden – “Don’t buy from Jews” – is back. The call to boycott Jewish commerce is Europe’s oldest political appeal. Once again, as the tsunami of hate against Israel rolls out from the Right and the Left, from Islamist ideologues to Europe’s cultural elites, the demand is to punish the Jews. That the actions of the Israeli government are open to criticism is a fact. But what are the real arguments?

Firstly, that Israel is wrong to defy international law as an occupying force on the West Bank. But what about Turkey? It has 35,000 soldiers occupying the territory of a sovereign republic – Cyprus. Ankara has sent hundreds of thousands of settlers to colonize the ancient Greekowned lands of northern Cyprus. Turkey has been told again and again by the UN to withdraw its troops. Instead, it now also stands accused of destroying the ancient Christian churches of northern Cyprus.

Does anyone call for a boycott of Turkey, or urge companies to divest from it? No. Only the Jews are targeted.

Or take India; 500,000 Indian soldiers occupy Kashmir. According to Amnesty International, 70,000 Muslims have been killed over the past 20 years by these soldiers and security forces – a number that far exceeds the Palestinians killed by Israeli forces in the same period. But the Islamic ideologues focus on Jews, not Indians.

May we talk of the western Sahara and Morocco, or Algeria’s closure of the border there, making life far worse than that of Palestinians in Ramallah or Hebron? No, better not.

Voltaire – anti-Semite that he was – should be alive today to mock the hypocrisy of the new high priests calling anathema on the heads of Jews in Israel.

Second, the desire for peace in the Middle East is a global priority. But peace requires recognition of the Jewish state of Israel. There are 40 member states of the UN which have the words “Muslim” or “Islamic” in their names. No one challenges their right to exist or defend themselves.

Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza. Its reward was to have the territory turned into a new launch pad for rockets intended to kill Jews.

More rockets have been fired at Israel from Gaza than V1 or V2 rockets at London in 1944. No one blamed Winston Churchill for responding with all the force he could, as cities like Hamburg or Dresden faced the wrath of the RAF. But if Israel takes the slightest action against the Jew-killers of Hamas, all the hate of the world falls on its head.

Third, it is hard to see how peace can be made with an Israel that so many seek to brand an “apartheid state.”

I worked in the 1980s with the black trade union movement inside South Africa. We lay in ditches as the apartheid police patrolled townships hunting for political activists. I could not swim at the same beach as my wife, a French-Vietnamese, because of the racist laws. Muslims and Jews swim off the same Tel Aviv beaches. They can stay in the same hotels, be elected to the same parliament, and appeal to an independent judiciary for justice.

BY DEFINITION, an apartheid state has no right to exist. It cannot be a member of the UN. The campaign to call Israel an apartheid state is a campaign to make it a non-state. How can peace be made with a state whose opponents say should not exist?

In Britain, there are calls by journalists and professors to boycott the Israeli media or universities. But Israeli writers, journalists and professors are the main opponents of the counterproductive policies of their government. To boycott them is to hand even more power to the haredi and Russian nationalists who now control Right-wing politics in Israel.

By any standard, the attacks on media freedom, on women, on gays or on lawyers is 1,000 times worse in Iran or Saudi Arabia. There is no democracy in Syria or Libya, limited democracy in Jordan, and open anti-Semitism displayed by the Muslim Brotherhood movements in the Arab world. Is there any call to boycott these states, their journalists or professors? No. The call – rightly – is for engagement, contacts, debate and discussion. Many even argue for talks with Hamas, although its charter, with its strident anti- Semitic language, could have been written by a Nazi.

But talks with Jewish politicians, lawyers or intellectuals must be boycotted. This policy of making the Jewish citizens of Israel into objects of global hatred will only make the Middle East crisis worse. If it was directed evenly at all states which occupy and oppress territories, it might have some basis in morality. If the boycott, disinvestment and sanctions movement also called for sanctions against the new anti-Semitism of the extreme Right in Europe, it might make sense. The openly anti- Semitic Jobbik Party in Hungary parades in its fascist uniforms. Anti-Semitic politicians are elected to the European Parliament. The German politician Thilo Sarrazin can describe Jews as having “different genes” from other people. And now Europeans, of all people, once again cry Kauft nicht bei Juden.

Those who dislike Israeli rightwing policies must find other language than that of classical anti- Semitism. I am not Jewish. As a British MP, I work with thousands of Muslims in my constituency. I am more often in mosques than in churches. I am proud of my Muslim friends who are MPs, peers, municipal councillors or prominent as journaIists, lawyers, doctors and intellectuals. The 20 million European Muslims face new hates which must be combated. But there is no profit for them in joining the hate campaigns against Jews in Israel.

As Europeans we must reject the old language of boycott and economic campaigns against Jews. Israel, Palestine and Europe must all have a 21st century future, and not return to the hates of the past.

Report of the All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Antisemitism

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

All-Party Parliamentary Group against Antisemitism (2006).

The 2006 report of the all-party Parliamentary inquiry examines contemporary antisemitism in the UK. It addresses the issue of defining antisemitism, concerns about recent increases in antisemitic incidents and antisemitic discourse, and the sources of contemporary antisemitism. The report makes recommendations for how government, the police, non-governmental institutions and wider society should address the report’s concerns.



View article

Terrorist Incidents against Jewish Communities and Israeli Citizens Abroad, 1968-2003

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

Community Security Trust (CST) (2004).

The report collates and analyses key incidents against Jewish communities and Israelis abroad perpetrated by Palestinian, Islamist, neo-Nazi and other terrorist groups.



View article

NEW REPORT RELEASED: Antisemitic Incidents Report 2007

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

Community Security Trust (2008)

The annual report publishes statistics and analysis of antisemitic incidents in Britain.



View article

The significance of anti-semitism in current German right-wing extremism

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

German Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (2002).

This official report evaluates the nature, extent and threat from far-right antisemitism in Germany. The presence of ideological antisemitism, overt antisemitic expression, and its more coded forms are highlighted. The relationship of antisemitism in Germany to anti-Zionism, the legacy of the Holocaust and international events are stressed. The appendices address fluctuations in antisemitic incidents in Germany between 1993 and 2002.



View article

All-Party Inquiry into Antisemitism: Government Response One year on progress report

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

Department of Communities and Local Government (2008)

In September 2006, the All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Antisemitism published a comprehensive report about the sources of contemporary antisemitism in Britain. The report made 35 recommendations which set out what the Inquiry believed would improve the situation. The Government response of 29 March 2007 undertook to take action across government to respond to the report recommendations. Following the Government’s response to the Inquiry report a cross-government working group was established and tasked with responding to the Inquiry recommendations. The working group also included membership from key Jewish organisations. This report sets out what the Government has achieved over the last year in tackling Hate Crime and more specifically antisemitism. The report reviews what the Government has achieved and sets out the commitment to continue to take practical, effective action to stamp out antisemitism whenever and wherever it occurs.



View article

Chronicle of Antisemitism in Ukraine & Russia: 2005-2006

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

Union of Councils for Soviet Jews (UCSJ) (2007).

The article chronicles high profile incidents of antisemitism in Russia and the Ukraine in 2005 and 2006.



View article

Anti-Semitism in Romania 2002 Report

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

Marco Maximillian Katz (2002). Center for Monitoring and Combating the Anti-Semitism in Romania. The Romanian Jewish Community.

The report considers antisemitic incidents, antisemitism in politics, Holocaust denial and contemporary attitudes towards Jews in Romania in 2002.



View article

Nationalism, xenophobia and intolerance in contemporary Russia: Jews as a particularly vulnerable group

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

A. Axelrod and T. Lokshina (2002). Moscow Helsinki Group.

This chapter from the 2002 annual report of the Russian human rights monitoring organisation the Moscow Helsinki Group addresses antisemitismin 2001. Violent incidents, vandalism, the dissemination of antisemitic literature, and the government response to them are all considered.



View article

Antisemitism, Xenophobia and Religious Persecution in Russia’s Regions: 2001

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

Union of Councils for Soviet Jews (UCSJ) (2002).

This comprehensive report documents and analyses incidents of antisemitism throughout Russia in 2001.



View article